Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01zs25xb94r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarlsson, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKhrabrov, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKaganovich, I.-
dc.contributor.authorSommerer, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKeating, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-02T16:56:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-02T16:56:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01zs25xb94r-
dc.description.abstractThe two particle-in-cell codes EDIPIC and LSP are benchmarked and validated for a parallel-plate glow discharge in helium, in which the axial electric field had been carefully measured, primarily to investigate and improve the fidelity of their collision models. The scattering anisotropy of electron-impact ionization, as well as the value of the secondary-electron emission yield, are not well known in this case. The experimental uncertainty for the emission yield corresponds to a factor of two variation in the cathode current. If the emission yield is tuned to make the cathode current computed by each code match the experiment, the computed electric fields are in excellent agreement with each other, and within about 10% of the experimental value. The non-monotonic variation of the width of the cathode fa ll with the applied voltage seen in the experiment is reproduced by both codes. The electron temperature in the negative glow is within experimental error bars for both codes, but the density of slow trapped electrons is underestimated. A more detailed code comparison don e for several synthetic cases of electron-beam injection into helium gas shows that the codes are in excellent agreement for ionization rate, as well as for elastic and excitation collisions with isotropic scattering pattern. The remaining significant discrepancies between the two codes are due to differences in their electron binary-collision models, and for anisotropic scattering due to elastic and excitation collisions.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsRead me and data files.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relationPlasma Sources Science and Technology, Volume 26, Number 1, p. 014003, 2017en_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/26/1/014003en_US
dc.subjectvalidationen_US
dc.subjectbenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectuncertainty quantificationen_US
dc.subjectparticle-in-cellen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo collisionsen_US
dc.subjectglow dischargeen_US
dc.titleValidation and benchmarking of two particle-in-cell codes for a glow dischargeen_US
dc.typeDataseten_US
pu.projectgrantnumber31016 G0001 10003086 101-
pu.depositorStratton, Brentley-
dc.contributor.funderU. S. Department of Energy contract number DE-AC02-09CH11466en_US
Appears in Collections:Plasma Science & Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DenHartogGlowDischargeElectricField.txt464 BTextView/Download
fig05data.txt19.99 kBTextView/Download
fig05plot.py1.23 kBUnknownView/Download
fig06data.txt20.14 kBTextView/Download
fig06plot.py1.23 kBUnknownView/Download
fig07data.txt19.3 kBTextView/Download
fig07plot.py1.21 kBUnknownView/Download
fig09data.txt27.58 kBTextView/Download
fig09plot.py906 BUnknownView/Download
fig10data.txt28.98 kBTextView/Download
fig10plot.py906 BUnknownView/Download
fig11data.txt28.97 kBTextView/Download
fig11plot.py906 BUnknownView/Download
intereHe4-consolidated.tab25.62 kBUnknownView/Download
intereHe4.tab66.8 kBUnknownView/Download
readme.txt2.33 kBTextView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.