Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xd07gs69b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, Alan B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Henry S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKling, Jeffrey R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:55:16Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:55:16Z-
dc.date.issued1999-01-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business and Economic Statistics, Volume 19, No. 3, July 2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xd07gs69b-
dc.description.abstractAn instrumental variable can be used to identify the labor market return to schooling by allowing comparisons between groups of individuals whose differences in schooling levels are uncorrelated with their underlying marginal benefit from schooling and with other aspects of unobserved ability. When the education decisions are based on individual-specific marginal benefits and costs, there is no single rate of return for everyone in the population. This paper demonstrates economic insights from methods interpreting instrumental variables estimates as weighted averages of individual-specific causal effects of schooling on wages by synthesizing existing theoretical and econometric work, and by using geographic variation in college proximity as an example of an instrumental variable. Characterizing the groups affected by the college proximity instrument, I find the largest increase in schooling levels among individuals from more disadvantaged backgrounds. Although the data is insufficient to obtain useful estimates of group-specific rates of return, I directly compute the weight each group receives in the overall estimate. In analyzing the response function and showing the level of schooling at which individuals change their behavior in response to the instrument, I demonstrate that the instrument has the greatest impact on the transition from high school to college. This corresponds to the economic intuition that changes in the marginal cost of college should be concentrated at this transition and should not affect all levels of schooling equally. The results suggest that disadvantaged groups are most responsive to policies lowering college costs, and that increases in education for these groups may have high payoff.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 415en_US
dc.subjectreturns to educationen_US
dc.subjectestimation of causal effectsen_US
dc.titleInterpreting Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Returns to Schoolingen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
415.pdf2.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.