Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ww72bf305
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFlower, Harriet I-
dc.contributor.authorMann, Caroline Palo-
dc.contributor.otherClassics Department-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T18:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-11T21:10:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ww72bf305-
dc.description.abstractReligious transgression was an observable cultural phenomenon during the Roman Republic. It occurred in a variety of forms, from petty thefts committed out of greed, to elaborate cursing rituals. Willful, knowing actions that violated correct religious behavior caused religious crises that had potentially deleterious consequences for both the responsible individual and for the community or state. Religious transgression was most fundamentally a problem of violating the will of the gods. The Romans had underlying assumptions that the will of the gods was knowable, and that to disregard it could cause disaster. Divine vengeance was viewed as a very real threat, and operated in concert with civic methods of punishment. Moments of religious wrongdoing were opportunities to realign public actions with the preferences of the gods, both by punishing transgressors and by enacting expiatory actions. Roman political institutions, particularly the senate, played the key roles in determining what had gone wrong religiously and how to rectify it. In smaller communities, equivalent civic bodies or magistrates fulfilled that role. The goal in rectifying a transgression was to propitiate the wronged deities and to realign Roman actions with divine interests. Transgression also developed as a trope in invective and historiographical writing, an application that was effective because it was rooted in a legitimate fear of retribution from the gods. Religious misdeeds had the power to retrospectively explain misfortunes that the Romans experienced because they were regarded with genuine trepidation.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University-
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> catalog.princeton.edu </a>-
dc.subjectAuspices-
dc.subjectReligion-
dc.subjectReligious crimes-
dc.subjectRoman Republic-
dc.subjectRome-
dc.subjectTransgression-
dc.subject.classificationAncient history-
dc.subject.classificationClassical studies-
dc.subject.classificationReligious history-
dc.titleReligious Transgression in the Roman Republic-
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)-
pu.embargo.terms2021-01-30*
Appears in Collections:Classics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mann_princeton_0181D_12840.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.