Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vh53wz70g
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Hanioğlu, Mehmed Şükrü | - |
dc.contributor.author | Radovanovic, Jelena | - |
dc.contributor.other | Near Eastern Studies Department | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-10T15:21:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-08T00:00:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vh53wz70g | - |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation examines the incorporation of the Niš sancak into the Serbian nation-state after its annexation by Serbia from the Ottoman Empire in 1878. It analyzes several distinct but connected processes, which together comprised this transition: the region’s administrative integration, demographic transformation, and changes in property ownership. I examine how the displacement of Muslim property owners and the establishment of a temporary, special legal system in the annexed region in order to facilitate its incorporation into Serbia contributed to property redistribution in the nation-state. In contrast to the prevailing scholarship that attributes nineteenth-century political turmoil in the Balkans primarily to the birth of nationalism, I argue that property disputes played a central role in the political transformations of the region in this period. I demonstrate that these disputes, which had challenged the legitimacy of the Ottoman Empire, continued to pose a challenge to the nation-state, albeit under different circumstances. This work traces how Serbia implemented its property laws, which were based on Western models, in an annexed territory where property had previously been regulated by a complex overlap of Islamic law, the Ottoman Land Code, local regulations, and custom. I focus in particular on the types of property, such as vakıf in the city and çiftlik in the hinterland, that did not have exact counterparts in the European/Roman legal tradition which Serbia chose to embrace. I argue that Serbian legislators’ ability to frame these forms of property as non-European and non-modern enabled the state to interpret them in ways that led to their dissolution and appropriation by the new nation-state. I locate my case-study on a wider map of competing claims on Ottoman property, discourses of civilization and modernization, international diplomacy, and state-building in the Balkans. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Princeton, NJ : Princeton University | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | The Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> catalog.princeton.edu </a> | - |
dc.subject | ciftlik | - |
dc.subject | nation-state | - |
dc.subject | Ottoman Balkans | - |
dc.subject | property | - |
dc.subject | Serbia | - |
dc.subject | waqf | - |
dc.subject.classification | Near Eastern studies | - |
dc.subject.classification | Middle Eastern history | - |
dc.subject.classification | East European studies | - |
dc.title | Contested Legacy: Property in Transition to Nation-State in Post-Ottoman Niš | - |
dc.type | Academic dissertations (Ph.D.) | - |
pu.embargo.terms | 2022-04-08 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Near Eastern Studies |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Radovanovic_princeton_0181D_13283.pdf | 1.79 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.