Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01sn00b1813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPronin, Emily
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Jose
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T22:07:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-30T22:07:15Z-
dc.date.created2020-04-27
dc.date.issued2020-09-30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01sn00b1813-
dc.description.abstractIn this study we put 41 Princeton University student-athletes through a survey in order to investigate the player/coach relationship, and attempt predict how a player will internalize and respond to constructive criticism from their coach. We hypothesize that naïve realism and self-esteem would allow us to accurately predict how biased a player perceives their coach to be and how negatively or positively they would respond to criticism. Through correlational testing, we find that there was a significant positive correlation between the self-esteem measure and perceived bias. Naïve realism did not produce any significant results. We also found that the critical feedback scale that includes the two measures: positive/negative response and perceived bias had a significantly negative correlation that could provide some insight into how perception of bias could be detrimental to a player/coach relationship.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titlePlayer/Coach Dilemma: The Effects of Self-Esteem & Naïve Realism on the Internalization and Response to Critical Feedback
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses
pu.date.classyear2020
pu.departmentPsychology
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage
pu.contributor.authorid920057274
Appears in Collections:Psychology, 1930-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MORALES-JOSE-THESIS.pdf492.27 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.