Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s7526f88k
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Dasgupta, Shamik | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Smith, Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sims, Lauren | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-20T12:56:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-20T12:56:33Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2016-04-04 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-07-20 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s7526f88k | - |
dc.description.abstract | What does empirical, psychological research on situated rationality mean for contemporary theories of self-knowledge and moral responsibility in philosophy? In this paper, I consider four cases of non-deliberative thought and action — stereotype threat, implicit bias, unreflective voting decisions, and manipulative advertising practices that lead to harm. Extending Victoria McGeer’s points in The Moral Development of First-Person Authority, I clarify how supporting democratic policies that mitigate unwanted effects of these judgments can develop our own self-knowledge and capacity for individual responsibility. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 41 pages | * |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | McGeer and Hurley on Self-Knowledge and Responsibility | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2016 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Sims._LJ_SeniorThesis.pdf | 2.13 MB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.