Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01qr46r324pFull metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Goldberg, Adele | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ellis, Danielle | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-28T14:10:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-06-28T14:10:48Z | - |
| dc.date.created | 2016-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-06-28 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01qr46r324p | - |
| dc.description.abstract | One verb can be used to convey a variety of actions, and using a verb in a specific syntactic structure provides information about the verb’s sense that gives the sentence overall meaning. This research sought to determine how changing the sense of a verb, by using it in a caused-motion construction, would affect people’s perception of the verb’s meaning in isolation. The experiment consisted of similarity judgments between a pair of verbs and comparing those ratings to a similarity judgment of the same verb pair with one verb used in a cause-motion sentence. The results indicated that verb meaning remains stable even when the verb’s context shifts. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 54 pages | * |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | Do Verbs in Motion Stay in Motion? The stability of verb meanings across sentential context | en_US |
| dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
| pu.date.classyear | 2016 | en_US |
| pu.department | Psychology | en_US |
| pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Psychology, 1930-2020 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis_-_Danielle_Ellis.pdf | 712.27 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.