Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01pg15bh73k
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKurtzer, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Matthew-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T17:09:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-14T17:09:33Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-01-
dc.date.issued2019-08-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01pg15bh73k-
dc.description.abstractThe 2017 Qatari Crisis shattered Middle Eastern political norms and highlighted the differences between Qatar and its Gulfi neighbors. The history and recent catalysts leading to the dispute point to a significant difference in priorities. Qatar values influence. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain value stability. This difference is large enough to leave lasting impacts on the Arabian Gulf and imperil the future of the Gulf Cooperation Council. This dichotomy manifests itself in familial crises, differences with Iran, relationships with terrorism and the Muslim Brotherhood, and in the media landscape. These factors lead to the ultimate conclusion that the Gulf Cooperation Crisis is stuck in a purgatory. It will not be disbanded, but without a state compromising their sovereignty or their values there is no foreseeable end to the diplomatic dispute.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleA Hostile Dependency: Qatar and the Gulf Cooperation Councilen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentPrinceton School of Public and International Affairsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961158666-
Appears in Collections:Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MILLER-MATTHEW-THESIS.pdf956.42 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.