Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01p8418n302
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSinger, Peter-
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorLarson, Evan-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T15:23:20Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-15T15:23:20Z-
dc.date.created2013-04-03-
dc.date.issued2013-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01p8418n302-
dc.description.abstractMy thesis rejects utilitarian rationing, as well as deontological approaches to rationing. Instead, my thesis endorses a new normative principle for allocating scarce resources: meaningful consequentialism with fairness. Meaningful consequentialism with fairness maximizes meaningful lives and takes into account concerns about fairness. I consider rationing cases to defend my view.en_US
dc.format.extent52 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleA NEW APPROACH TO RATIONING CASES: MEANINGFUL CONSEQUENTIALISM WITH FAIRNESSen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2013en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
dc.rights.accessRightsWalk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the <a href=http://mudd.princeton.edu>Mudd Manuscript Library</a>.-
pu.mudd.walkinyes-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
LarsonEvanThesis.pdf351.69 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.