Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ns064876s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPapapetros, Spyros-
dc.contributor.advisorGandelsonas, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorLopez Serfozo, Alissa-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T12:57:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-07T12:57:31Z-
dc.date.created2018-04-30-
dc.date.issued2018-08-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ns064876s-
dc.description.abstractEvery two years, the Venice Architecture Biennale hosts a unique spectacle of architecture. Architectural designers, historians and curators meet within a large-scale exhibition of architectural work from many different parts of the world. The discussions that arise provide a unique opportunity for architecture to interact within the discipline and with a public audience. Undeniably, the Biennale’s recurring nature has always made its scope a victim to its own ambiguity: is it supposed to show the architecture of the future, the past, or the past year? This remains a persistent question. While it is instinctive to describe the history of architecture at the Venice Biennale as a series of discontinuous themes and points of view, I am interested in a more subtle ambiguity. Each Biennale gives a different answer to the relationship between history and practice. I am interested in tracing these relationships at three scales: the curatorial project, the architectural objects, and the buildings of the Biennale. Each chapter of this thesis explores the question of La Biennale’s relationship to history, to the city of Venice itself, and to the formal typology of the Biennale’s spaces. This thesis begins with the 1980 exhibit, which appropriated the Arsenale’s linearity into the design of an interior street that staged the mingling of past and present architectural references. It goes on to examine the 1991 exhibition, which while aiming to increase the international presence at the Biennale, the curatorial project closely referenced strategies of the preceding four Biennales. Lastly, this thesis studies the 2010 exhibition which seems to betray the self-historicism of the early Biennales in favor of phenomenological experience. Upon closer inspection, as I will argue, each exhibition demonstrates an extensive knowledge of past Architecture Biennales and their curators.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleArchitecture as Building, Object, and, Curatorial Project: Retracing the History of Architecture Exhibitions at the Venice Biennaleen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2018en_US
pu.departmentArchitecture Schoolen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid960734955-
pu.certificateUrban Studies Programen_US
Appears in Collections:Architecture School, 1968-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LOPEZSERFOZO-ALISSA-THESIS.pdf5.41 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.