Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Holtz-Eakin, Douglas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Joulfaian, David | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rosen, Harvey | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:45:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:45:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1992-03-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1993 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines tax return-generated data on the labor force behavior of people before and after they receive inheritances. The results are consistent with Andrew Camegie’s century-old assertion that large inheritances decrease a person's labor force participation. For example, a single person who receives an inheritance of about $150,000 is roughly four times more likely to leave the labor force than a person with an inheritance below $25,000. Additional, albeit weaker, evidence suggests that large inheritances depress labor supply, even when participation is unaltered. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 302 | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5533%28199305%29108%3A2%3C413%3ATCCSEE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z | en_US |
dc.subject | inheritance | en_US |
dc.subject | estate | en_US |
dc.subject | labor supply | en_US |
dc.title | The Carnegie Conjecture: Some Empirical Evidence | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
302.pdf | 2.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.