Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoltz-Eakin, Douglasen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoulfaian, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Harveyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:45:52Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:45:52Z-
dc.date.issued1992-03-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1993en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines tax return-generated data on the labor force behavior of people before and after they receive inheritances. The results are consistent with Andrew Camegie’s century-old assertion that large inheritances decrease a person's labor force participation. For example, a single person who receives an inheritance of about $150,000 is roughly four times more likely to leave the labor force than a person with an inheritance below $25,000. Additional, albeit weaker, evidence suggests that large inheritances depress labor supply, even when participation is unaltered.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 302en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5533%28199305%29108%3A2%3C413%3ATCCSEE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Zen_US
dc.subjectinheritanceen_US
dc.subjectestateen_US
dc.subjectlabor supplyen_US
dc.titleThe Carnegie Conjecture: Some Empirical Evidenceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
302.pdf2.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.