Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n296wz13w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKillingsworth, Mark R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:43:41Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:43:41Z-
dc.date.issued1975-10-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Human Resources, Vol. XI, No. 3, Summer 1976en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n296wz13w-
dc.description.abstractModels of the labor supply behavior of single persons predict that a negative income tax (NIT) will always reduce the labor supply and earnings of such persons. I consider three models of family labor supply; and find that in all three, a NIT might raise a given family member's labor supply and might also raise total family labor supply: in one, a NIT could even raise total family earnings. These models and recent empirical estimates (showing positive NIT effects on some family members’ labor amply and on some families’ earnings) suggest that the work disincentive effects and the cost of a NIT may be less than has previously been thought.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 78en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-166X%28197622%2911%3A3%3C354%3AMANITR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2en_US
dc.titleMust a Negative Income Tax Reduce Labor Supply?: A Study of the Family's Allocation of Timeen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
78.pdf1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.