Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01kh04ds14h
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Burgess, John | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Garber, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Sean | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-20T13:12:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-20T13:12:57Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2016-04-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-07-20 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01kh04ds14h | - |
dc.description.abstract | The central question addressed in the thesis is whether Eccles’ narrative of dualist interactionism is convincingly better than any other dominant consciousness theory that preserves the causal closure of the physical realm. The answer defended is that, for the most part, it is not. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 25 pages | * |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | An Evaluation of Eccles’ Dualist-Interactionism | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2016 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Oh_-_Thesis_-_Final.pdf | 300.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.