Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01k643b3556
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFleischer, Jason W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, Chien-Hungen_US
dc.contributor.otherElectrical Engineering Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T15:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T15:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01k643b3556-
dc.description.abstractThe integration of optical hardware and computational software interweaves strengths and alleviates limitations of both sides in the design of imaging systems. For example, computational algorithms treat imaging as a signal sensing, suggesting smart sampling and incorporating a priori information of the desired signal. On the other side, add-on optics resolves ill-posed digital processing and intractable computation by utilizing physical components and modeling. This interdisciplinary approach, called computational imaging, integrates optics, image processing and computer science to optimize the design of imaging systems. This dissertation starts with a classic example of computational imaging in phase measurement, which gives important information about object surface, internal structure, optical depth, and wave dynamics. However, the phase of light oscillates so fast that CCD / CMOS camera can only capture the average field (i.e. the intensity), resulting in the loss of the phase of optical signal. Nevertheless, phase accumulates during optical propagation, meaning that the complex components can still be retrieved through intensity-only measurements by cooperating well-designed algorithms. Popular computational algorithms include deterministic approaches such as the transport-of-intensity equation (TIE) and statistical methods such as the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm (GS). The former solves a wave equation by a set of in-focus and defocused images. The latter iterates intensity observations at the near- and far-field to find the optimal phase. However, both of them employ assumptions of linear propagation of light in classical systems. In this dissertation, we relax these assumptions and generalize computational methods with higher-order optics, including light-field imaging, nonlinear photonics and quantum entanglement, leading to prominent computational phase imaging.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectcomputational imagingen_US
dc.subjectlight-field imagingen_US
dc.subjectnonlinear imagingen_US
dc.subjectphase imagingen_US
dc.subjectphase opticsen_US
dc.subjectquantum imagingen_US
dc.subject.classificationOpticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationComputer scienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhysicsen_US
dc.titleComputational Phase Imaging in Nonlinear and Quantum Systemsen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Electrical Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lu_princeton_0181D_11552.pdf19.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.