Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jd472w450
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Henry S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEisenberg, Theodoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:46:15Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:46:15Z-
dc.date.issued1999-07-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jd472w450-
dc.description.abstractWe develop a model of the plaintiff’s decision to file a law suit that has implications for how differences between the federal government and private litigants and litigation translate into differences in trial rates and plaintiff win rates at trial. Our case selection model generates a set of predictions for relative trial rates and plaintiff win rates depending on the type of case and whether the government is defendant or plaintiff. In order to test the model, we use data on about 350,000 cases filed in federal district court between 1979 and 1997 in the areas of personal injury and job discrimination where the federal government and private parties work under roughly similar legal rules. We find broad support for the predictions of the model.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 418en_US
dc.subjectcase selectionen_US
dc.subjectlitigationen_US
dc.subjecttrialsen_US
dc.titleThe Government As Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Modelen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
418.pdf3.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.