Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j9602063p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAshenfelter, Orley-
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-11T19:52:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-11T19:52:21Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-28T00:00:00Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j9602063p-
dc.description.abstractIn this essay I review Sylvia Nasar’s long awaited new history of economics, Grand Pursuit. I describe how the book is an economic history of the period from 1850-1950, with distinguished economists’ stories inserted in appropriate places. Nasar’s goal is to show how economists work, but also to show that they are people too--with more than enough warts and foibles to show they are human! I contrast the general view of the role of economics in Grand Pursuit with Robert Heilbroner’s remarkably different conception in The Worldly Philosophers. I also discuss more generally the question of why economists might be interested in their history at all.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 568-
dc.titleEconomic History or History of Economics? A Review Essay on Sylvia Nasar’s Grand Pursuit: the Story of Economic Geniusen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber3602050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GrandPursuit Review--Nov-28th 2011--final.pdf141.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.