Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j3860926q
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLieberman, Evanen_US
dc.contributor.advisorImai, Kosukeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWaddell Boie, Jaquilyn Raeen_US
dc.contributor.otherPolitics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T19:40:43Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T19:40:43Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j3860926q-
dc.description.abstractSince the 1980s, ethnic civil conflicts, and especially self-determination movements, have dominated the type of armed conflicts present in the international system. While studies on ethnic civil violence have increased over the past several decades, there remains much debate regarding the conditions associated with the incidence of ethnic civil violence. The question remains: why do some ethnic groups choose to engage in certain types of civil violence while others do not? This dissertation contributes to the study of ethnic civil violence by analyzing the onset of such violence and offering a new theoretical approach to account for it. Drawing from theories of ethnic group dynamics, rational choice, and collective action, I argue that ethnic group size is an important determinant of ethnic group decisions to initiate ethnic civil violence. Utilizing quantitative analyses of global conflict data from 1946 to 2009, survey analyses of Afrobarometer data from 2005 to 2009, and comparative historical case studies drawn from Africa and Western Asia, I demonstrate that the likelihood of ethnic civil violence, as well as the form such violence takes, varies significantly with the proportion of the total state population an ethnic group constitutes. Specifically, I show that while small ethnic groups are more likely to initiate secession to establish independence from the state, large ethnic groups are more likely to attempt revolution to capture the center. Moreover, against the preponderant sentiment that there is ``power in numbers,'' I show that smaller groups challenge the state more frequently than large groups. Finally, I show that group member attitudes and preferences vary consistently with group size, and in accordance with the trends we observe in ethnic civil conflict. Taken together, these results suggest that there is power in numbers, and that ethnic groups utilize the strengths of their groups' relative size to seek redress of grievances.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectcollective actionen_US
dc.subjectethnic conflicten_US
dc.subjectethnic politicsen_US
dc.subjectrebellionen_US
dc.subjectrevolutionen_US
dc.subjectsecessionen_US
dc.subject.classificationPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationInternational relationsen_US
dc.subject.classificationPublic policyen_US
dc.titleThe Power of Numbers: Ethnic Group Size, Collective Action, and Ethnic Civil Conflicten_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Politics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WaddellBoie_princeton_0181D_11381.pdf9.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.