Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hv51r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGoldberg, Adele-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, David-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T14:44:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-17T14:44:24Z-
dc.date.created2014-03-31-
dc.date.issued2014-07-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hv51r-
dc.description.abstractI provide a critique of Discourse Representation Theory, a formalism that works at the intersection of model theoretic semantics and generative syntactic theory. In doing so, I aim to provide a more general critique of formal semantics and provide some alternative approaches towards a psychologically robust account of language.en_US
dc.format.extent84en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleA “Formal” Affair? An analysis of the empirical & conceptual underpinnings of Discourse Representation Theoryen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ZhengDavidST2014.pdf963.7 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.