Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fq977x230
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorHarman, Gilbert-
dc.contributor.advisorRosen, Gideon-
dc.contributor.authorMcDougal, Austen-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T13:13:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-20T13:13:57Z-
dc.date.created2016-03-31-
dc.date.issued2016-07-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fq977x230-
dc.description.abstractMy thesis considers whether someone should be punished less (or not at all) when she has complete memory loss of the relevant crime. Utilitarianism, rather than supporting our intuition that full punishment is somehow problematic in the case of the amnesiac, furnishes a solid defense of full punishment. Retributivism, on the other hand, does provide some reasons for mitigating punishment—namely, that the ideal goods of punishment can’t be fully achieved and that some potential evils of punishment arise in the case of the amnesiac.en_US
dc.format.extent61 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleAmnesia and the Justification of Punishmenten_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
McDougal_Austen_Amnesia_and_the_Justification_of_Punishment.pdf354.79 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.