Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01dr26z074n
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Rudloff, Birgit | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hoffenberg, Andrew | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-29T14:24:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-29T14:24:34Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2015-04-13 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-07-29 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01dr26z074n | - |
dc.description.abstract | Instead of focusing on traditional mean-variance optimization, portfolio managers should emphasize risk measures that focus on downside deviations. In this document, I examine three risk measures in particular: the Sharpe ratio, the Sortino ratio, and the Ulcer Performance Index. These three measure the risk-adjusted return of a portfolio, however each uses a different measure of risk. My objective is to examine how each measure performs in different market scenarios: longterm, short-term, and recessionary. Through optimization techniques and sensitivity analysis, I conclude that the Sortino ratio functions as a better measure of risk than the Sharpe ratio and Ulcer Performance Index. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 67 pages | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Efficient Portfolio Allocation and Risk Management Techniques | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2015 | en_US |
pu.department | Operations Research and Financial Engineering | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2000-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
PUTheses2015-Hoffenberg_Andrew.pdf | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.