Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cn69m414g
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Staiger, Douglas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Spetz, Joanne | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Phibbs, Ciaran | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:57:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:57:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008-12-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cn69m414g | - |
dc.description.abstract | A variety of recent theoretical and empirical advances have renewed interest in monopsonistic models of the labor market. However, there is little direct empirical support for these models, even in labor markets that are textbook examples of monopsony. We use an exogenous change in wages at Veterans Affairs hospitals as a natural experiment to investigate the extent of monopsony in the nurse labor market. In contrast to much of the prior literature, we estimate that labor supply to individual hospitals is quite inelastic, with short-run elasticity around 0.1. We also find that non-VA hospitals responded to the VA wage change by changing their own wages. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 545 | en_US |
dc.subject | monopsony | en_US |
dc.subject | nurse labor market | en_US |
dc.subject | empirical support | en_US |
dc.title | Is There Monopsony in the Labor Market? Evidence From A Natural Experiment | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
545.pdf | 73.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.