Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019w032541f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFarber, Henry Sen_US
dc.contributor.advisorLee, David Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldin, Jacoben_US
dc.contributor.otherEconomics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T20:01:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-07T20:01:13Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019w032541f-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation studies behavioral economics and the design of public policy. Chapters 1 and 2 investigate tax salience—the notion that the prominence of a tax shapes the extent to which taxpayers account for it when making purchasing decisions. In many contexts, policymakers can control a tax’s salience and Chapter 1 investigates how such control should be exercised to best promote consumer welfare. Chapter 2 turns to distributional concerns relating to tax salience. For some taxes, salience effects may vary by income; in work co-authored with Tatiana Homonoff, I investigate how policymakers can take advantage of this fact to make the distribution of such taxes less regressive. Drawing on state and time variation in cigarette tax rates, we empirically investigate whether salience effects vary by income and find evidence consistent with this theory. Chapter 3 turns away from tax salience to broader issues concerning behavioral economics and public policy. In numerous settings, behavior varies according to seemingly arbitrary features of the decision-making environment, such as which option is the default, the order in which options are presented, or which option characteristics are salient. Optimal policy design requires accounting for the preferences of decision-makers whose choices are sensitive to such factors, but traditional revealed preference analysis breaks down in that setting. In work co-authored with Daniel Reck, I consider binary choice problems in which preference-irrelevant “frames” affect the behavior of decision-makers and develop an empirical framework for identifying decision-makers’ ordinal preferences given limited data. We show that preference identification hinges upon understanding the empirical relationship between decision-makers’ preferences and their consistency. By recasting the behavioral preference recovery problem in these terms, familiar insights from the program evaluation literature can be fruitfully adapted to this new setting. We illustrate our proposed techniques with data from a range of recent empirical studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectBehavioral Economicsen_US
dc.subjectLaw and Economicsen_US
dc.subjectPublic Financeen_US
dc.subjectTaxationen_US
dc.subjectTax Salienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationBehavioral psychologyen_US
dc.titleEssays in Behavioral Economics and Taxationen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goldin_princeton_0181D_11493.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.