Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019019s2474
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAshenfelter, Orleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorOaxaca, Ronalden_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:57:01Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:57:01Z-
dc.date.issued1987-01-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Economic Review, Vol.77, No. 2, May 1987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019019s2474-
dc.description.abstractAlthough The Economics of Discrimination has left a large schol legacy. we believe the empirical methods associated with the study of and sex discrimination have had a still larger impact on practical mat Our purpose in this paper is to give some small insight into how this scholarly literature has ended up as a major factor in the litigation many civil disputes where race and sex discrimination are alleged.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 216en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28198705%2977%3A2%3C321%3ATEODEE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2en_US
dc.subjectdiscriminationen_US
dc.subjectlitigationen_US
dc.titleThe Economics of Discrimination Thirty Years Later: Economists Enter the Courtroomen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
216.pdf773.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.