Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018k71nh102
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRouse, Ceciliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorButcher, Kristinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:58:19Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:58:19Z-
dc.date.issued2000-07-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, Summer, 1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018k71nh102-
dc.description.abstractSome argue that a high union wage premium and the industrial council system are important causes of inflexibility in the South African labor market. We estimate union premia on the order of 20 percent for African workers and 10 percent for White workers. We also find that African nonunion workers who are covered by industrial council agreements receive a premium of 6-10 percent; the premium is positive but not statistically significant for Whites. In addition, although the union gap is smaller inside of the industrial council system than outside of the system for Africans, the total union premium for union members covered by an industrial council agreement is similar to the union premium outside of the industrial council system. Among Africans, the industrial council and union wage gaps are largest among low wage workers.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 442en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0276-8739%28199822%2917%3A3%3C457%3ACEOTRB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Nen_US
dc.titleA Study of the Wage Impacts of Unions and Industrial Councils in South Africaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
442.pdf3.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.