Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62fb44z
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKotkin, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.advisorPravilova, Ekaterinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.otherHistory Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-21T19:33:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-21T06:10:53Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62fb44z-
dc.description.abstractWhere most histories of governance, market life, and economic culture look at how markets are built, this dissertation investigates instead how they are dismantled; it asks how the Bolsheviks attempted to dismantle market life in revolutionary Russia during and after the October Revolution. The Revolution signaled a rupture in economic and material life no less than in politics and ideas, meaning that the transformation of Russian state structures occurred simultaneously with attempts to form a non-market economy. It was through the dismantling of the market, through confiscation, inventorying, and redistributing material possessions, that the Bolshevik state and governing practices were formed. The research presented here investigates the lived experience of socialist revolution in Russia between 1916 and 1922 through the prism of material things. In the weeks and months after the Bolsheviks seized power, they declared themselves, and the dissolving state they inherited from the Imperial regime, to be the rulers not only of the land and the people, but also of a dazzling array of material objects. Through case studies of particular objects such as buildings, movable goods, valuables, and money, the chapters that follow illuminate the cultivation of new categories of economic life and new tools for managing them in the crucible of revolutionary practice, to reveal the interplay of the multiple mentalities at work in the revolutionary era, derived from socialist ideology, the Imperial inheritance, and the basic requirements of governance. The experience of revolution, the dissertation argues, was not simply a field where other, already-existing forces in social and political life played out; it bore a productive capacity in its own right. The experience of socialist revolution left a deep imprint on individuals, interpersonal relationships, and institutions, cleaving to state forms and practices in the sphere of material goods and things.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectinventoryen_US
dc.subjectrequisitionen_US
dc.subjectrevolutionen_US
dc.subjectsovieten_US
dc.subjectstateen_US
dc.subjectvalueen_US
dc.subject.classificationRussian historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEuropean historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEconomic historyen_US
dc.titleA Noah's Ark: Material Life and the Foundations of Soviet Governance, 1916-1922en_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-11-21en_US
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ODonnell_princeton_0181D_11134.pdf941.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.