Institutional Trust: A Survey Analysis of Energy-Efficient Attitudes and Public Perception of Scientific Integrity in the United States

Abstract

Although an abundance of research exists on the American public’s perception of anthropogenic climate change, the policy decisions surrounding the issue have become extremely polarized in media and politics. The American public expresses substantial doubt in scientific consensus related to the dangers of climate change despite the level of agreement exhibited by climate scientists and the scientific community. In this study of scientific integrity and authority, I conduct an empirical test, with a sample size of just under 500, where respondents are asked to identify their respective opinions on climate change. From comparative analysis of past studies on climate science refutation and public policy polarization, I intend to provide statistical support that ideologically conservative and those with less educational attainment are prone to mistrusting scientific institutions. Also, I hope to identify religiosity and alternative media consumption as influential factors in fostering institutional-based trust in science throughout our society.