Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015425k982p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoldin, Jacob-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-25T19:59:01Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-25T19:59:01Z-
dc.date.issued2013-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015425k982p-
dc.description.abstractRecent empirical work suggests that consumers systematically misperceive commod-ity taxes when the after-tax price is not prominent. I show how policymakers may utilize such low-salience taxes to enhance consumer welfare. The optimal combination of high-and low-salience taxes balances two competing welfare effects: low-salience taxes accommodate lower tax rates but induce consumers to misallocate their budgets. The efficiency gains from implementing the optimal policy are substantial, up to the entire deadweight loss from distortionary taxation. The surprising result that the optimal policy is to induce taxpayer mistakes can be readily understood as an application of the theory of the second-best.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 571a-
dc.titleOptimal Tax Salienceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
571a.pdf351.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.