Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816p93n
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Morison, Benjamin C. | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Smith, Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kraft, Gregory | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-26T20:17:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-26T20:17:27Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2015-04-02 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-26 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816p93n | - |
dc.description.abstract | In A Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume says, “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions.” The sentiment expressed in this sentence characterizes what most followers of Humean metaethics believe—that moral judgments are not the products of reason. Rather, reason can only serve to tell us how to best fulfill our desires. This common interpretation of Hume has led to a subjectivist moral outlook. I argue, however, that even if we accept Hume’s understanding of the relation between reason and desires, we still end up with an objective morality. Hume’s ultimate conclusion is that one only ever ought to seek to satisfy one’s own desires. It will turn out that Hume’s conclusion will also entail that one only ever ought to maximize one’s own happiness, simply based on the kinds of things desires are. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 57 pages | * |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Hume the Hedonist Humean Metaethics and the Maximization of Pleasure | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2015 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
PUTheses2015-Kraft_Gregory.pdf | 651.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.