Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816p93n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMorison, Benjamin C.-
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorKraft, Gregory-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-26T20:17:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-26T20:17:27Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-02-
dc.date.issued2015-06-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816p93n-
dc.description.abstractIn A Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume says, “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions.” The sentiment expressed in this sentence characterizes what most followers of Humean metaethics believe—that moral judgments are not the products of reason. Rather, reason can only serve to tell us how to best fulfill our desires. This common interpretation of Hume has led to a subjectivist moral outlook. I argue, however, that even if we accept Hume’s understanding of the relation between reason and desires, we still end up with an objective morality. Hume’s ultimate conclusion is that one only ever ought to seek to satisfy one’s own desires. It will turn out that Hume’s conclusion will also entail that one only ever ought to maximize one’s own happiness, simply based on the kinds of things desires are.en_US
dc.format.extent57 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleHume the Hedonist Humean Metaethics and the Maximization of Pleasureen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Kraft_Gregory.pdf651.45 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.