Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013f462828q
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNehamas, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Hudson-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-30T13:43:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-30T13:43:19Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-08-
dc.date.issued2019-07-30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013f462828q-
dc.description.abstractThis essay elaborates on Susan Sontag's definition of interpretation as requiring two distinct stages, and ultimately finds her call for an increase in formal analysis unpersuasive on account of the interconnectivity of interpretation and formal analysis.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleIn Defense of Interpretation: An Analysis of Susan Sontag's Call for an Erotics of Arten_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961167220-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
COOKE-HUDSON-THESIS.pdf287.59 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.