Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013f462828q
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Nehamas, Alexander | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cooke, Hudson | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-30T13:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-30T13:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2019-04-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-30 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013f462828q | - |
dc.description.abstract | This essay elaborates on Susan Sontag's definition of interpretation as requiring two distinct stages, and ultimately finds her call for an increase in formal analysis unpersuasive on account of the interconnectivity of interpretation and formal analysis. | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | In Defense of Interpretation: An Analysis of Susan Sontag's Call for an Erotics of Art | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2019 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
pu.contributor.authorid | 961167220 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
COOKE-HUDSON-THESIS.pdf | 287.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.