Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0137720c73w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOyer, Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:54:40Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:54:40Z-
dc.date.issued1995-11-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0137720c73w-
dc.description.abstractThis paper shows that, in addition to varying with the calendar business cycle, manufacturing firms‘ sales are significantly higher at the end of the fiscal year, and lower at the beginning, than they are in the middle. The causes of these fiscal-year effects are investigated, emphasizing the role of salespeople and their motivation to meet quotas and earn a bonus. In many industries firms have substantially lower average prices toward the end of fiscal years, but price changes cannot explain all the effect of fiscal years on revenue seasonality. It is shown that the industry variation in the fiscal year revenue and price effects are correlated with type of product, distribution method, and the industry average salesperson turnover rate. The results are consistent with a sales quota model of fiscal seasonality, where all salespeople can vary their effort throughout the fiscal year but only some salespeople can influence the timing of their customers’ purchases.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 354en_US
dc.subjectcompensationen_US
dc.subjectincentive contractsen_US
dc.subjectseasonalityen_US
dc.subjectfiscal yearen_US
dc.subjectsalespeopleen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Sales Incentives on Business Seasonalityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
354.pdf3.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.