Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741v02j
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Garber, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kohler, Sebastian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bullington, Evan C.D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-29T13:30:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-29T13:30:34Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2015-04-01 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-29 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741v02j | - |
dc.description.abstract | My thesis is concerned with the susceptibility of professional philosophers to cognitive biases and unreliable intuitions when encountering thought experiments in ethics arguments. I examine relevant intuition unreliability using empirical research largely concerning the trolley problem. Finally, I offer some normative propositions to ethicists to improve the implementation of at least one type of thought experiments in ethics. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 61 pages | * |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | The Reliability of Moral Intuitions and the Status of Thought Experiments in Ethics | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2015 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
PUTheses2015-Bullington_Evan_C.D..pdf | 390.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.