Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741v02j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGarber, Daniel-
dc.contributor.advisorKohler, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorBullington, Evan C.D.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-29T13:30:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-29T13:30:34Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-01-
dc.date.issued2015-06-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741v02j-
dc.description.abstractMy thesis is concerned with the susceptibility of professional philosophers to cognitive biases and unreliable intuitions when encountering thought experiments in ethics arguments. I examine relevant intuition unreliability using empirical research largely concerning the trolley problem. Finally, I offer some normative propositions to ethicists to improve the implementation of at least one type of thought experiments in ethics.en_US
dc.format.extent61 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe Reliability of Moral Intuitions and the Status of Thought Experiments in Ethicsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Bullington_Evan_C.D..pdf390.69 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.