Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741r813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBraverman, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorMantel, Kevin-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-26T15:46:08Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-26T15:46:08Z-
dc.date.created2013-05-06-
dc.date.issued2013-07-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0105741r813-
dc.description.abstractPrior to elections, voters often determine how they will vote based on public opinion polls. If the results of these polls are changed, the strategies of many voters can be affected at once. We consider the idea that a self-interested Poll Manipulator, with control over these polls, may modify the results in an attempt to sway the election toward its favored alternative. We find that, under certain assumptions about its power, the Poll Manipulator can, in many cases, cause its favored alternative to be elected, often at a severe cost to the voters. We examine conditions for the Poll Manipulator’s success in Plurality rule, Plurality with Runoff, STV, and a modified Plurality with [Mandatory] Runoff, which is least affected among these rules.en_US
dc.format.extent43 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleElection Manipulation Through Misrepresentation of Pre-election Pollsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2013en_US
pu.departmentComputer Scienceen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
dc.rights.accessRightsWalk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the <a href=http://mudd.princeton.edu>Mudd Manuscript Library</a>.-
pu.mudd.walkinyes-
Appears in Collections:Computer Science, 1988-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Kevin Mantel.pdf340.58 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.